- The updated and high-performance Brooks® Beast ’20 road-running shoes are designed for comfortable movement and motion control for smooth heel-to-toe transitions.
- Predecessor: Beast ’18.
- Support Type: Overpronation/Stability.
- Cushioning: Maximum cushioning.
- Surface: Road.
- Differential: 12 mm.
- Built for the sever overpronator who requires motion control and high-level cushioning.
- Breathable engineered mesh upper provides a comfortable and cool in-shoe environment.
- External, structured saddle allows for adjustable support.
- Lace-up closure.
- External heel counter helps stabilize the foot.
- Plush tongue and collar.
- Element mesh lining wicks moisture away, and offers a great in-shoe feel.
- Removable sockliner.
- BioMoGo DNA midsole is a blend of earth-friendly BioMoGo and responsive Brooks® DNA, and has a gender-friendly cushioning design, making for a dynamic ride.
- Full-length S-257 Cushsole midsole compound utilizes an insole board for increased plush and flexibility.
- DRB® Accel shank-like unit promotes torsional rigidity in the mid-foot, while allowing the heel and forefoot to act independently.
- Full-length Segmented Crash Pad encourages a smooth heel-to-toe transition with each step.
- Durable HPR Green™ outsole is comprised of environment-friendly silica for premium wet-dry traction and skid resistance.
- Abrasion-resistant HPR Plus rubber outsole provides extended durability right where it’s needed.
- Omega Flex Grooves allow for more natural forefoot movement and fluidity.
- Linear platform.
- APMA Approved: The American Podiatric Medical Association Seal of Acceptance is awarded to products that promote good foot health and are substantiated by a committee of discerning podiatrists by wear-testing and review of the application and supporting documentation. APMA Acceptance must be applied for and is not automatically available to styles that meet its criteria.
- PDAC A5500 Approved: Pricing, Data Analysis and Coding A5500 Diabetic Medicare Coding is awarded to footwear that is available in three or more widths, with a removable insole (sock-liner). It allows individuals to pay for their footwear through their Medicare. PDAC must be applied for on a yearly basis and is not automatically available to styles that meet its criteria. For more specific info, visit the Medicare website or call 1-800-MEDICARE.
- Imported.
- Product measurements were taken using size 9, width D – Medium. Please note that measurements may vary by size.
- Weight of footwear is based on a single item, not a pair.
- Measurements:
- Weight: 13 oz
Brooks Sneakers & Athletic Shoes Beast ’20
$159.95 Original price was: $159.95.$96.99Current price is: $96.99.
SKU: Sneakers & Athletic Shoes 9305382 Categories: Shoes, Sneakers & Athletic Shoes Tags: Black/Ebony/Grey, Blue/Grey/Peacoat
- Free Shipping over $25
- The quality solution for all your needs.
- Secure Shopping Starts with Safe Payments
- Friendly, efficient service, always online.

| Color | Black/Ebony/Grey, Blue/Grey/Peacoat |
|---|---|
| size | 10, 10.5, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5 |
| width | 4E – Extra Wide, D – Medium, EE – Wide |
25 reviews for Brooks Sneakers & Athletic Shoes Beast ’20
Add a review Cancel reply
Related products
Sale!
Rated 4.50 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 4.46 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 4.58 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 4.88 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 3.17 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 4.13 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 4.91 out of 5
Sale!
Rated 4.50 out of 5
























LouisJV –
I am too old to run anymore but I have super high arches and am trying to walk a lot. I have the Beast 18 and wanted another pair of shoes so I can alternate. I use ortho inserts with both shoes. I like the Beast 20 just fine and feel the bounce as I walk. Finding size 15 shoes has always been a problem for me but the Beast fits well including my orthodics.
John –
I’m actually quite fond of the Brooks Beast 18. I think it’s probably the best Beast yet, with its enlarged toe box, comfortable and very breathable engineered mesh, and well reinforced heel counter. The rather thick sole (an apparently growing trend with shoe makers like Hoka and others, who take it to more extremes) provides the perfect levels of stability and movement control, even for users who don’t suffer from severe over-pronation.
I was curious to find out how the slightly lighter new Brooks 20 compared. Like the 18, its engineered mesh upper is comfortable and even a bit mor spacious. The heel counter is toned down but still adequate. So far so good.
Buts it’s the new guide-rails, popular on so many other new Brooks shoes, that fail as a replacement for the more grounded and stable sole support system of earlier Beasts, including the 18. The 20 and it’s guide rails Just doesn’t provide anything close to the stability and sure-footedness as its 18 predecessor for my large 6’2” frame.
i’m now quite happy that I purchased quite a few 18s in my size.
John –
An update to my first review: My first review was written after a hour of walking around in my brand new Brooks Beast 20s on house carpet only (in case I had to return them for a refund). Today, I’ve worn them for the entire day, on hardwood floors, tiled floors, and for a few short runs around the block on concrete sidewalks. And I have changed my mind about them. Yes, their soles are not quite as stiff (some might say rigid) as those on the Brooks 18 and previous model Beasts. But they are still more firm and supportive than almost any running (not walking) shoe I’ve ever worn. The sole bottoms are as wide as the 18s, providing a nice stable platform. The rear heel counters are far less stiff and confining than those on the 18, providing good support but sparing me any of the achilles heel and ankle twinges I occasionally experience with the 18s. The breathable pliable engineered mesh over the top middle and toe box areas provides even more room for the foot and toes than on the 18s, something I’ll be able to appreciate late on a hot summer day when my feet sometimes begin to swell a bit. My wife says they look much better than the 18s, which she thought were too thick in the sole and clunky looking. Fact is that the 20’s sole is the same thickness as that on the 18s. But Brooks has built and engineered them, together with their large inside guiderails, to look far less beefy and far more sleek and stylish, like a slightly thicker-soled GTS 20. To longtime devotees of the Brooks Beast who are larger and on the heavier side (with over-pronation) than my 6’2″ 180 pound frame, the Beast 18s might still be the definitely preferable shoe. I can only say that, for myself, giving the Beast 20 a good workout and a second chance proved to me just how comfortable and enjoyable they are.
Anonymous –
If you are a Beast fan and you order the black color or Ebony color you will discover that they fit narrow.
The grey color fits me great. True to size and width(2E). The dark colors are totally different. Beware.
Neal –
The fits ok, but the quality is terrible. I’ve bought a lot of the brooks beast and these are by far the worst ones made. The fabric and sole is cheap and can’t be cleaned. I’ll be looking for a replacement brand. I’ve probably bought somewhere around 75 of these over the years. A lot of money but they were worth it. I have 6 pair in the closet now. What happened to the quality? Why change it.
Anonymous –
I have worn Brooks Beasts for many years, and they have always fit perfectly, until now. The new design is too narrow in the toe. I have returned the shoes. Why did Brooks have to ruin a good thing?
Iva –
I am a 6′ 2″, 200 lbs runner/walker for 32 years and for the last 20 years Brooks Beast is my choice. I do 6 miles per morning for 5 days. The current materials are softer and insoles are good. The toe box is roomy. Cushioning and stability, I could not find better. I get about 275-300 miles and then the cushioning starts to disappear. The downside is the outside rubber soles just rubs out quickly.
I have to put in a pair of arch supports for my high arch.
Edward –
As someone who’s been wearing Beast since about 2000, I couldn’t be more disappointed when I received these. I ordered blindly assuming I’d be getting the same shoe I’ve been buying 1 – 2x/year. Brooks has removed the stability insert from the molded cushion and replaced it with “guiderails” or whatever they’re calling it. They also went to a single density cushioning system. Both these changes are clearly intended to cheapen the manufacturing process through the reduction of complexity. I would expect if they were going to do this, they’d also change the price point. Why would anyone pay a $25 – $60 premium, if the shoe no longer has the premium stability features. I returned these and went with the Mizuno Wave Inspire 16 for $25 less and am really please with my first run.
JWalker –
The change from ’18 to the ’20 was hugely disappointing. The rigid stability of the Beast no longer holds up try to find the 18s online and buy those. It used to be worth the price but not anymore- feels cheaper and cheaper with each purchase.
JohnC –
Most excellent shoe. Supreme padding. Lasts longer than other shoes doing 5 days a week running. I love the extra support, saved my ankle being twisted more than once.
ScottG –
Sad to say, but the Beast as we used to know it is dead. 2020 has made a habit out of tearing apart the old and ushering in the new but unfortunately, the new is not always better. Initially one can’t help but be impressed with the look and weight of the new Beast but for the real runners out there who have relied on the stability and extra support the old beast provided, this is not your shoe. I was recommended the old Beast and it allowed me to run without being in pain, something I was unable to do before. After running with the new Beast I have knee pain, back pain, and shin splints, which were never an issue. While I am in no way saying that the new beast won’t be favorites among many wearers, it simply is a broken promise to those who truly relied on what the previous editions offered.
DeborahH –
it is cheaply made they need to go back to beast 18
LaiQ –
Got this for my boyfriend as a gift and he loves it. He is extremely flat-footed and said they’re very comfortable.
HowardU –
Very disappointed that you reduced the motion control feature of the Beast shoe. I have returned the Beast 20 and bought the Addiction 14 which does not compare to the older model Beast 18 (have purchased at least 8 pairs over the past number of years).
Kls –
I have been wearing the Beast for years as it was always marketed/designed as Brook’s most supportive and sturdy shoe for stability, arch support, over pronation, etc. Until now, the Beast has lived up to the promise. The new version 20 is a disappointment. Brooks seems to have gone the way of many manufacturers who can’t decide whether to make a truly supportive/healthy shoe or switch to the house-shoe trend which is often form over function. The immediate differences in the 20 is the lack of arch support, stability/guidance, and the material is so thin and stretchy that the foot slides around. The stress on the foot is noticeable and I would not trust it to keep feet/knees protected beyond very mild strolling. In previous versions you knew your foot was cradled, aligned and supported properly; you could run, power walk or hike with confidence without pain or stress – which was always the reputation of the “BEAST”. I reached out to Brooks about the support system change, which they acknowledge, and they referred me to the Addiction 14. Tried the Addiction and stability was sorely lacking; knees and arches started aching within 10 minutes. Brook’s shoes, materials and craftsmanship alway stood above other manufacturers before now; I hope they will reconsider bringing back the same qualities that existed in Beast 18 and previous versions. Not sure where to go after my 18’s are finished.
Anonymous –
I bought these shoes for the same reason most people buy them: because my orthopedic doctor told me I had to. Yes, they have more support than any other sneaker. If you have serious foot/arch issues and live long enough, these shoes are your fate. They are comfortable, your feet will not hurt in them. But dear God in Heaven, they are beyond ugly. I used to care about shoes. I once had something resembling some kind of fashion sense. Now I can be seen in public with Brooks Beasts on my feet. This means I have officially lived too long.
Anonymous –
Great shoe, true to size.
John –
I’ve been wearing Brooks Beast for a decade. I was always delighted with the fit and quality. This ’20 Beast is a shocker. Shoddy materials and construction. I’ve worn them for less than a month and there are holes in the uppers. The support is sagging. The sole compound has zero grip on wet surfaces. I sure hope they go back to a quality shoe for the 2021 version–if not, I’ll have to abandon this shoe. Serious disappointment. I cannot recommend this version of the Beast.
Anonymous –
I over pronate. Beast 16 and 18 were my go to shoes and solved this problem. Beast 20 is completely different. Little to no stability. Big disappointment. What were they thinking?
Anonymous –
When I first used these shoes they were fantastic for the first 2 weeks. I was feeling good about my purchase. I like to go on 2 hour walks but after 2 weeks these expensive shoes fell apart. The material even ripped apart on both shoes after a week! (see picture). The real issue is after 2 weeks they have very little support the reason I buy Beasts! I can’t wear them anymore, RIP $179. My feet hurt if I try a walk in them now. Brooks ruined the Beast. Stay away from these shoes is my suggestion. I used to love the 2016, 2018 models that were constructed well and last.
Anonymous –
Have been using brooks beast for many moons.
There was a quality issue (first ever have seen).
Emailed Zappos support and issue resolved extraordinarily quickly.
So in addition to offering a great product, the customer service is just outstanding at Zappos.
Anonymous –
This is my 3rd pair of these, that should tell you everything you need to know.
Anonymous –
Great motion control shoe for someone with knee issues. Consistently comfortable and provides good support.
Judi –
Holes formed in less than a month with normal wear.
DennisM –
Fit well and they are comfortable. Easy to keep clean. Fair price considering the quality of the shoe compared to all others I have tried. Only problem was that one toe box developed a permanent dent which detracts from the overall look.